05 / LIMITS
FIG. 5 · WRONG TOOL
When an autonomous web agent is the wrong choice
Buying the wrong category is expensive. Three cases where you should not use an agent, ours included.
There is a documented API
If the source publishes a stable, well documented API and your access is permitted, use it. It
will be faster, cheaper and contractually cleaner than any browsing agent. An agent earns its
keep where no API exists.
You need a CI test suite
Regression testing your own app in a pipeline wants deterministic, assertion-driven code.
Playwright and Selenium exist for that and are the right answer. WebRobot is built for data
workflows, not QA suites.
The data is behind a hard wall
The robot honors robots.txt and rate limits, and it will not defeat CAPTCHAs or paywalls put up
to keep automation out. The legal picture is worth reading first:
is web scraping
legal.
Where an agent does fit, pricing is flat rather than metered by credit: Launch at $79 per month (5
robots, 10,000 records, daily schedules), Scale at $249 (25 robots, 100,000 records, hourly schedules,
change alerts and agent actions such as logins and multi-step forms), Autopilot at $699 (100 robots, 1
million records, real-time monitors and autonomous multi-step agent flows). Yearly billing brings those
to $63, $199 and $559. Full detail on the pricing
page, and the mechanics of a run are broken down in
how it works.